Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GitAuto: [FEATURE] Refactor to use HttpClientFactory for HTTP client management #416

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

gitauto-ai[bot]
Copy link

@gitauto-ai gitauto-ai bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Resolves #231

What is the feature

This feature refactors the HTTP client integration library to utilize HttpClientFactory instead of directly instantiating HttpClient. Leveraging HttpClientFactory will enhance the lifecycle management of HttpClient instances, improve performance, and prevent issues such as DNS changes handling and socket exhaustion.

Where / How to code and why

Refactor HTTP Client Instantiation

  1. Update Dependencies:

    • Ensure the project references the necessary NuGet package for HttpClientFactory. If using ASP.NET Core, this is included by default.
  2. Modify HTTP Client Usage:

    • Identify all instances where HttpClient is directly instantiated within the classes.
    • Inject IHttpClientFactory into the constructors of these classes.
    • Use the factory to create HttpClient instances.
    public class MyService
    {
        private readonly HttpClient _httpClient;
    
        // Inject IHttpClientFactory into the constructor
        public MyService(IHttpClientFactory httpClientFactory)
        {
            _httpClient = httpClientFactory.CreateClient();
        }
    
        public async Task<string> GetDataAsync()
        {
            var response = await _httpClient.GetAsync("https://api.example.com/data");
            response.EnsureSuccessStatusCode();
            return await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
        }
    }
  3. Configure HttpClientFactory:

    • Configure named or typed clients as necessary within the dependency injection setup, typically in Startup.cs or the relevant configuration file.
    public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
    {
        services.AddHttpClient<MyService>(client =>
        {
            client.BaseAddress = new Uri("https://api.example.com/");
            client.DefaultRequestHeaders.Add("Accept", "application/json");
        });
    }
  4. Test Refactoring:

    • Update existing tests to accommodate the changes in HttpClient instantiation.
    • Ensure all tests pass and validate that HttpClient instances are managed correctly by the factory.
  5. Update Documentation:

    • Revise documentation to reflect the new method of creating and managing HttpClient instances.
    • Provide examples demonstrating the usage of HttpClientFactory with the library.

Migration Guide

If these changes introduce breaking changes, provide a migration guide outlining the steps required to transition to the new HttpClientFactory implementation. This guide should include:

  • Steps to update constructors to accept IHttpClientFactory.
  • Instructions on configuring HttpClientFactory in the dependency injection container.
  • Examples of updated service implementations.

Anything the issuer needs to do

  • Review and merge the pull request.
  • Update any dependent projects or services to accommodate the changes if breaking changes are involved.
  • No further action required.

Test these changes locally

git fetch origin
git checkout gitauto/issue-231-20250109-001433
git pull origin gitauto/issue-231-20250109-001433

Summary by Sourcery

Enhancements:

  • Update HTTP client instantiation to use IHttpClientFactory and configure named or typed clients within the dependency injection setup.

Copy link

korbit-ai bot commented Jan 9, 2025

By default, I don't review pull requests opened by bots. If you would like me to review this pull request anyway, you can request a review via the /korbit-review command in a comment.

Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request refactors the VTEX library to use HttpClientFactory for improved HTTP client management. It replaces direct instantiation of HttpClient with the use of IHttpClientFactory for creating and managing client instances. The changes involve updating constructors, configuring dependency injection, and ensuring proper test coverage.

Sequence diagram for HTTP client creation flow

sequenceDiagram
    participant Service as VtexHealthClient
    participant Factory as IHttpClientFactory
    participant Client as HttpClient
    Service->>Factory: Constructor(loggerFactory, httpClientFactory)
    Service->>Factory: CreateClient()
    Factory-->>Service: Return managed HttpClient instance
    Note over Service,Client: HttpClient lifecycle now managed by factory
Loading

Class diagram showing the updated VtexHealthClient structure

classDiagram
    class IVtexHealthClient {
        <<interface>>
    }
    class VtexHealthClient {
        -ILogger _logger
        -HttpClient _httpClient
        +VtexHealthClient(ILoggerFactory loggerFactory, IHttpClientFactory httpClientFactory)
    }
    class IHttpClientFactory {
        <<interface>>
        +CreateClient() HttpClient
    }
    VtexHealthClient ..|> IVtexHealthClient
    VtexHealthClient --> IHttpClientFactory : uses
    note for VtexHealthClient "Now uses IHttpClientFactory
for HttpClient creation"
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Refactored VtexHealthClient to use IHttpClientFactory.
  • Injected IHttpClientFactory into the VtexHealthClient constructor.
  • Used httpClientFactory.CreateClient() to create HttpClient instances.
  • Updated tests to accommodate the changes.
Src/VTEX.Health/VtexHealthClient.cs
Refactored VTEXWrapper to use IHttpClientFactory.
  • Used _httpClientFactory.CreateClient() to create HttpClient instances.
  • Removed direct instantiation of HttpClient and HttpClientHandler.
Src/VTEX/VTEXWrapper.cs

Assessment against linked issues

Issue Objective Addressed Explanation
#231 Refactor HTTP client instantiation to use HttpClientFactory instead of direct HttpClient creation
#231 Modify code to inject IHttpClientFactory where needed and use it to obtain HttpClient instances
#231 Improve performance and avoid potential issues related to DNS changes and socket exhaustion

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
    this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@gstraccini gstraccini bot added enhancement New feature or request gitauto GitAuto label to trigger the app in a issue. good first issue Good for newcomers hacktoberfest Participation in the Hacktoberfest event help wanted Extra attention is needed 👷🏼 infrastructure Infrastructure-related tasks or issues 🕔 high effort A task that can be completed in a few days 🧑‍💻 tech-debit Technical debt that needs to be addressed 🧪 tests Tasks related to testing labels Jan 9, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. It seems to have been created by a bot (hey, gitauto-ai[bot]!). We assume it knows what it's doing!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 9, 2025
@gstraccini gstraccini bot added 🚦 awaiting triage Items that are awaiting triage or categorization 🤖 bot Automated processes or integrations labels Jan 9, 2025
Copy link
Author

gitauto-ai bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Committed the Check Run linter-check error fix! Running it again...

Copy link
Author

gitauto-ai bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Approve permission(s) to allow GitAuto to access the check run logs here: https://github.com/settings/installations/52064309/permissions/update

Copy link
Author

gitauto-ai bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Committed the Check Run Deep Source Coverage report error fix! Running it again...

Copy link
Author

gitauto-ai bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Approve permission(s) to allow GitAuto to access the check run logs here: https://github.com/settings/installations/52064309/permissions/update

@AppVeyorBot
Copy link

Build VTEX-SDK-dotnet 2.4.347 failed (commit 3f35618bc7 by @gitauto-ai[bot])

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

💻 Scan logs
1:00AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
1:00AM INF 359 commits scanned.
1:00AM INF scan completed in 289ms
1:00AM INF no leaks found

Copy link
Author

gitauto-ai bot commented Jan 9, 2025

▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ 45%
Calling get_remote_file_content() with {'file_path': 'Src/VTEX.Health/VtexHealthClient.cs', 'line_number': 59}...

@guibranco guibranco closed this Jan 9, 2025
@guibranco guibranco deleted the gitauto/issue-231-20250109-001433 branch January 9, 2025 02:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🚦 awaiting triage Items that are awaiting triage or categorization 🤖 bot Automated processes or integrations enhancement New feature or request gitauto GitAuto label to trigger the app in a issue. good first issue Good for newcomers hacktoberfest Participation in the Hacktoberfest event help wanted Extra attention is needed 🕔 high effort A task that can be completed in a few days 👷🏼 infrastructure Infrastructure-related tasks or issues size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. 🧑‍💻 tech-debit Technical debt that needs to be addressed 🧪 tests Tasks related to testing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[FEATURE] Refactor to use HttpClientFactory for HTTP client management
2 participants